Post ID | Date & Time | Game Date | Function |
---|---|---|---|
#51585 | 07/26/2017 3:10:16 pm | ||
wickersty Joined: 05/11/2017 Posts: 1002 Deadwood Perambulators II.1 | We are in a tear-down and rebuild year, which means we're shedding all salary and age, accepting a few years of dreadful win-loss records, and developing talent. That said, which of the following would you keep this year if you were me? The 29 y/o 16/16/9/9 who can't play defense or The 27 y/o 12/9/14/16 who can't play defense Neither are going to improve much anymore in their careers, and the 29 y/o had a good contact-hitting half-season for me last year. I'm leaning towards cutting the 29 y/o and giving the 27 y/o his job. What would you do? Thanks jeff |
||
#51586 | 07/26/2017 3:17:42 pm | ||
Pig_Cola Joined: 09/15/2013 Posts: 1445 Glendale Marshals III.2 | I would keep the 29 year old, but also look for a replacement for him. The 27 year old doesn't have a hitting report, so his BA will be kind of bad. And the 27 year old can't play defense that well. | ||
#51587 | 07/26/2017 3:22:48 pm | ||
AssumedPseudonym Joined: 10/26/2016 Posts: 1130 Deerfield Beach Rats V.7 | I agree. At least the 29-year-old can contribute a bat, as opposed to the 27-year-old who won’t be contributing much of anything. I’d definitely be looking for a replacement, though. | ||
#51588 | 07/26/2017 3:27:19 pm | ||
wickersty Joined: 05/11/2017 Posts: 1002 Deadwood Perambulators II.1 | Thanks guys! |