Post ID | Date & Time | Game Date | Function |
---|---|---|---|
#31456 | 03/04/2016 6:17:32 am | ||
Slug5373 Joined: 12/23/2014 Posts: 376 Inactive | Finally got a draft pick that was not 12 POT (first one all season). I got a 13 POT 23 year old player from the Asian pool who has already developed nicely; he just needs some rounding around the edges. Overall, for this stage in the draft with players like this disappearing, I'm satisfied. I'll keep him for now. He'll be a great defensive outfielder who can hit a little bit too. | ||
#31459 | 03/04/2016 6:32:23 am | ||
Holmes Joined: 11/07/2013 Posts: 1175 Inactive | In Latin America, I pulled an infielder with a rather decent-sounding scouting report. I was actually happy about the lucky late find, until I looked at his potential. http://brokenbat.org/player/126791 Could have lived with him having no defensive value whatsoever (what's the DH spot for?), but the SI points he has to distribute won't even make for a decent DH. Ciao, Bello. |
||
#31462 | 03/04/2016 6:56:44 am | ||
amalric7 Joined: 01/20/2016 Posts: 2238 New York Lancers V.4 | Went with HS. Choice between:- "He can be a strike out pitcher. He has good overall potential." Already have one of those, and:- "He can be a very good hitter. He can develop into an above average slugger. He can be solid in the field. He has good overall potential." Went with the latter and got Carl Dixon. Meh. |
||
#31464 | 03/04/2016 7:33:28 am | ||
wuggla Joined: 05/10/2013 Posts: 1059 Colorado Springs Vultures VI.28 | another college player drop POT 11 | ||
#31469 | 03/04/2016 8:19:49 am | ||
Shyfire Joined: 06/23/2015 Posts: 135 Inactive | got an 18 year old Dominican 12 pot corner infielder. Don't know what I will do with him in the long run but I guess i'll keep him for now. http://brokenbat.org/player/126925 |
||
#31474 | 03/04/2016 9:55:58 am | ||
Crazy Li Joined: 01/25/2015 Posts: 879 Inactive | Catch and release... 13POT 18yo C with a ton of range, outstanding field, and no arm... also no positive offense other than "decent slugger" Not the worst pick in the world, but not someone who could be useful to me at this point in time. I have other, better prospects in the minors at any position he could feasibly play. If he was an actual C, it would be another story. |
||
#31477 | 03/04/2016 10:42:22 am | ||
buffmckagan Joined: 12/22/2013 Posts: 651 Scranton Bears Legends | The second coming of Scranton's Dave Krieg, but with a better arm? Micah Maddox is a 17-year-old high school catcher who can develop into an above-average slugger, and can be solid in the field, with an arm of 15. I'm pretty pleased in what were low expectations for this round. |
||
#31478 | 03/04/2016 11:20:43 am | ||
AD24 Joined: 09/04/2015 Posts: 112 Inactive | went Latin and received a 1b 13 potential 1b named Crespin. I'll hold onto him for now. | ||
#31481 | 03/04/2016 12:36:32 pm | ||
newtman Joined: 11/02/2013 Posts: 3343 Inactive | I got another decent pitcher. I will hold him until next Friday, but ultimately his fielding SI is far too high to be a long term keeper on my team. | ||
#31485 | 03/04/2016 3:02:43 pm | ||
mjhack Joined: 10/17/2015 Posts: 98 Binghamton Bobcats VI.15 | @ newtman, would you mind explaining the fielding statement? Are you implying that players can use up potential in less needed skill? I went Latino for this draft and had no choice better than "good". Took a swing and a miss. | ||
#31486 | 03/04/2016 3:16:08 pm | ||
JJNZ Joined: 12/09/2014 Posts: 1581 Yakima Monster III.3 | mj - I think Newt has the same theory as me in that fielding contributes to the SI and therefore takes SI that could be pitching. Using 2 of my own minor leaguers as an example; Garrett has low enough fielding stats that he's basically a 13 pot guy (total of 13 tied up in arm/range), whereas Finley has 27 tied up - even allowing that fielding points for pitchers are only worth half an SI, that's 7 SI which won't go into pitching stats - can make quite a difference to the finishing of a pitcher. I don't feel I've explained it terribly clearly but hopefully you get the idea. Updated Friday, March 4 2016 @ 3:17:19 pm PST |
||
#31494 | 03/04/2016 5:50:53 pm | ||
Rock777 Joined: 09/21/2014 Posts: 9603 Haverhill Halflings III.1 | Had two goods and one very good, but I didn't like they all lacked positive hitting reports. Newtman might have liked a couple of them Ended up going with an above average 2B with "Good Hitting". |
||
#31496 | 03/04/2016 6:21:00 pm | ||
Dcmrulz Joined: 02/14/2013 Posts: 588 Inactive | No one with the Good Potential. It's round 6 and I had 4 great drafts, so I'm okay with this one being a catch and release. | ||
#31503 | 03/04/2016 11:09:43 pm | ||
newtman Joined: 11/02/2013 Posts: 3343 Inactive | @mjhack, what JJNZ said is a fairly accurate description. If a player has a listed 12 potential that means they will likely cap between 96-103. The listed player had 38 SI tied up in fielding skills, and was likely to have a few more in fielding itself by the time he was done. That would leave approximately 58 SI at most to be distributed among stamina plus the actual pitching skills. Although he was likely to max out with a devastating breaking ball, his velocity, CoS, and control were likely to be fairly low, meaning that at best he would be a one pitch pony, assuming his control got high enough to allow that pitch to be thrown effectively. Note: All of this analysis assumes that the average batter that the pitcher will be facing is of a high enough quality to be playing in LL II, which is a significantly better average batter than that faced in LL V and VI. @Rock, Raleigh is set on position players thank you, however the minors are holding open tryouts for any and all pitchers who think they can actually get outs without allowing a ridiculous number of runs. |
||
#31505 | 03/05/2016 12:48:10 am | ||
Favuz Joined: 02/26/2014 Posts: 639 Oxnard Sunsets IV.3 | Almost tempted to don't draft this week, because i didn't know who release. Released my last draft pick who was a decent 2b http://brokenbat.org/player/126271, and picked another 2b http://brokenbat.org/player/127044. Quinonez was more advanced, young and switch hitter. Jenkins has a way better description. i think i've been lucky to find this kind of player at round 6, even if i thought his potential would be higher (he'll have low BC and PD). |